Billionaire Elon Musk mentioned in a tweet that advisers that make suggestions to shareholders on the way to solid their votes at firm conferences had an excessive amount of energy due to their affect on passive funding funds.Musk’s feedback add to a long-running debate over whether or not such advisers have an excessive amount of sway over company decision-making.

In a tweet late on Monday Musk mentioned: “Far an excessive amount of energy is concentrated within the palms of ‘shareholder companies’ firms like ISS and Glass Lewis, as a result of a lot of the market is passive/index funds, which outsource shareholder voting selections to them.”

ISS, or Institutional Shareholder Providers, declined to remark. Glass Lewis additionally declined to remark.Proxy advisers led by ISS and Glass Lewis give suggestions to purchasers resembling pension schemes on how they need to vote on the whole lot from electing board members to signing off on executives’ pay and perks.

Musk, who owns Twitter and heads electrical carmaker Tesla, , was replying to a Twitter thread begun by Vivek Ramaswamy, the founding father of Try Asset Administration, who mentioned it was “staggering” how a lot affect the largest adviser, ISS, had on U.S. state buyers, treasurers and corporations.

The feedback are the most recent grievance by Musk in regards to the functioning of markets and observe earlier criticism over the best way electrical automobile firm Tesla, which he controls, is assessed by buyers from an ESG perspective. Prior to now, most criticism of the 2 proxy advisers has come from company executives when the advisers have urged shareholders to vote towards board suggestions, and from local weather activists searching for help for environmental resolutions.

Tutorial evaluations have discovered combined proof in regards to the proxy advisers’ influence. Jill Fisch, a professor of legislation on the College of Pennsylvania, in a 2010 paper estimated an ISS advice shifted 6% to 10% of votes.

She mentioned by way of e-mail on Tuesday the proportion now’s prone to be decrease as inside vote evaluations completed by prime buyers have change into extra refined.

U.S. Republican state officers have additionally weighed in, writing to the 2 advisory companies asking if their suggestions met their obligations to buyers.

Opposite to Musk, nevertheless, Republicans on the state and nationwide degree have additionally charged prime passive fund managers themselves have grown too aggressive with their proxy votes, a declare fund managers deny.

Tesla has confronted its personal disagreements with the proxy advisers. Final yr, as an illustration each ISS and Glass Lewis backed an advisory proposal to extend buyers’ skill to appoint administrators and really useful votes towards two Tesla administrators up for a vote over the board’s “inadequate responsiveness” to a previous shareholder vote.

The shareholder decision handed and the 2 administrators acquired help of 68% and 64% of votes solid, decrease than typical for main companies.

Keep on prime of know-how and startup information that issues. Subscribe to our day by day e-newsletter for the most recent and must-read tech information, delivered straight to your inbox.