In an open letter to Middlesex’s members, Cornish acknowledged {that a} current report within the Each day Telegraph had been an “correct depiction” of the membership’s monetary standing, following successful to their income from the Covid pandemic in 2020-21, plus a historic pensions miscalculation that has value the membership an additional £500,000 to rectify.

Nonetheless, Cornish additionally insisted that none of this was “new information”, and that with Middlesex forecast to return a revenue in 2023, any involvement of the ECB within the membership’s administration was merely a case of placing contingency plans in place, within the occasion of a “wet day”. At current the membership’s reserves have been diminished to £179,000, from greater than £2 million previous to the pandemic.

“Losses have been vital, the accounts are filed publicly for all to see, in addition to being despatched to all members and mentioned on the AGM, so there isn’t any hiding away from the truth that the final two years have been a particularly difficult time for Middlesex Cricket,” Cornish wrote.

“As I’ve stated, none of that is information to Middlesex members … we have now made each effort to make sure that this has been conveyed to you in as clear and open method as attainable.”

Not like the opposite 17 first-class counties, Middlesex is within the distinctive place of renting its house floor, Lord’s, from MCC – a scenario that has each exacerbated their present publicity, on condition that their sole income stream is from county cricket actions, but additionally ensures that they’re debt-free, with their landlords for instance footing the invoice for final 12 months’s £53 million redevelopment of the Compton and Edrich Stands.

For that motive, nonetheless, the earnings that Middlesex receives from the ECB makes up greater than 70 p.c of their general determine – £4.733 million out of £6.589 million, in response to their newest accounts, together with their long-standing county partnership settlement, plus an additional £1.3 million in return for agreeing to the staging of the Hundred.

“We’re rather more reliant on the income that the ECB supplies by way of its broadcast offers than our counterparts at different venues,” Cornish added. “This distinction comes about on account of us not proudly owning our personal floor and due to this fact being unable to stage worthwhile non-cricket occasions, which some may view as a blessing.

“With such a vested curiosity in defending the long run wellbeing of the English sport, and the counties which might be the stakeholders in it, it is just proper that open and trustworthy discussions are being had between each organisations to make sure that there’s an understanding of our place.”

In 2016, Durham was punished for receiving a £3.8 million ECB bail-out, with relegation from Division One, a 48-point deduction for the next season, and a lack of Check standing. Nonetheless, the brand new ECB management of Richard Gould and Richard Thompson, previously of Surrey, are unlikely to take such a tough line as they search to make the case that their regime is extra supportive of the counties than their forebears.

“We’re grateful for the help and assist the ECB are offering to the Membership all through this course of and can proceed to liaise with them carefully on this matter transferring forwards,” Cornish added. “They’re assured and inspired that the monetary place of the Membership at this level is much extra encouraging than beforehand.

“Nonetheless, while not like many different counties we have now no debt, we even have minimal property and that leaves our cashflow doubtlessly uncovered to the seasonality of cricket, therefore our want as accountable Administrators to make sure the Membership has contingency plans within the occasion of a ‘wet day’ – in the event you’ll forgive the pun.”